Some Gulf states signal they aren't opposed to paying fees in Hormuz, sources say

NEWS SUMMARY

Some Gulf states have signaled to the US and European countries that they are open to paying a fee for security in the Strait of Hormuz, but reject Iranian control of the waterway. This development follows US President Trump's suggestion for Gulf states to pay a fee for US security provision, which he later revised to expecting trade and investment deals.

Full BriefGenerated 25d ago

What Happened

Multiple US and regional officials told Middle East Eye that some Arab Gulf states have privately signaled they are not opposed to paying a fee for transit through the Strait of Hormuz, but they reject Iranian control over the waterway. The signals may explain why US President Donald Trump resurrected the idea of charging a 20 percent fee for protecting the strait, later walking it back on 15 April 2025 in favor of expecting Gulf states to invest more in the US. Trump’s remarks contrasted with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who stated on the same day that 'no country is allowed to charge tolls or fees' in international waterways. Iran’s efforts to impose a service fee have been undercut by Oman’s willingness to allow vessels to transit its territorial waters without consulting Iran, robbing Tehran of a legal rationale. In response, Iran has attacked Qatari, Emirati, and Saudi vessels in Omani waters.

Key Actors

·
Donald Trump(US President)Proposed a 20% fee for US security in the Strait of Hormuz, then replaced it with an expectation of trade and investment deals from Gulf states.
·
Marco Rubio(US Secretary of State)Publicly stated that no country is allowed to charge tolls or fees in international waterways, contradicting Trump's fee proposal.
·
Arab Gulf states(Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait)Signaled willingness to pay a toll for stability but firmly reject Iranian veto power or control over the strait.
·
Iran(Littoral state attempting to impose service fees)Blocked by Oman's unilateral transit allowance; retaliated by attacking Gulf-registered vessels in Omani waters.

Why It Matters

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint for global energy shipping. Gulf states' private openness to tolls, combined with Trump's transactional approach, could reshape the economic and security architecture of the waterway, potentially legitimizing fees that Iran has long sought. Oman's maneuvering under international law tightens Iran's options, while the US division between Trump and Rubio reveals internal policy friction. Iran's attacks in Omani waters risk escalating maritime incidents into a broader confrontation, drawing in regional and global powers.

Watch For

Monitor whether Iran escalates attacks on shipping in Omani waters or attempts new legal justifications for fees. Watch for concrete US-Gulf investment deals replacing fee proposals. Track any formal Omani-Iranian diplomatic friction over transit rights. Look for statements from Asian importers and Greek shipowners on potential costs, and note any UN Security Council or International Maritime Organization discussions on Hormuz transit rules.

Generated25d ago· Based onfull articleAuto-Compiled

This page aggregates and summarizes reporting from Middle East Eye. The Conflict Pulse does not author original reporting. Read the original source for full coverage.

READ ORIGINAL

SHARE ON X WHATSAPP REDDIT

CONFLICT OVERVIEW

Iran

Latest verified updates on Iran’s regional confrontation, U.S.–Israeli strikes, missile retaliation, proxy networks, sanctions, and Strait of Hormuz risks.

SOURCE PERSPECTIVES

How outlets across the bias spectrum are covering this conflict.

left

Iran-aligned Houthis claim they attacked oil refinery in Saudi Arabia

The Guardian Middle East

‘Like being in prison’: the ship crews stuck in Gulf since February

The Guardian Middle East

center

Pezeshkian recently met Supreme Leader Khamenei, state media reports

Middle East Eye

Why is Pezeshkian urging an end to Iran’s ‘no war, no peace’ status?

Al Jazeera