Al Jazeera
centerREPORTIRGC warns against new Hormuz route for ships: What we know

Full BriefGenerated 61d ago
What Happened
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a warning on Thursday to commercial vessels to use only transit routes through the Strait of Hormuz designated by Tehran, following Oman’s announcement on Wednesday of a new shipping corridor coordinated with the International Maritime Organization (IMO). The IRGC stated the Omani route was ‘unacceptable’ and posed ‘serious safety risks,’ insisting that ships must maintain contact with the IRGC Navy while transiting. The warning came after a Liberian oil tanker passed through the strait on Thursday using a route closer to Oman’s coastline, and amid fragile US–Iran negotiations following a memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed last week that halted hostilities and reopened the strait for 60 days. The MoU stipulates demining operations within 30 days and discussions on future arrangements, but leaves unresolved whether Iran will seek transit fees, greater control, or permanent routing changes.
Key Actors
- ·IRGC(Iran’s military force responsible for external operations and naval control in the Strait of Hormuz)Asserting sole authority over shipping lanes, rejecting Oman’s new route, and demanding vessels use only Iranian-designated corridors while maintaining contact with the IRGC Navy.
- ·Oman(Gulf state bordering the strait, represented by Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi)Announced and defended a new shipping corridor as safe and compliant with international law, rejecting any future transit fees and emphasizing freedom of navigation.
- ·United States(Signatory to the US–Iran MoU, counterpart in broader negotiations)Committed to halting hostilities and securing commercial passage, but faces Iranian demands for control and unresolved terms beyond the 60-day period.
Why It Matters
The Strait of Hormuz handles roughly one-fifth of global oil and LNG trade, making it a critical chokepoint for energy markets and global economic stability. Iran’s ability to disrupt or control transit provides strategic leverage in its confrontation with the US, and the IRGC’s warning threatens to unravel the fragile ceasefire and negotiation framework established by the MoU. Disagreements over routing, fees, and maritime authority could derail efforts to reach a permanent agreement, reignite hostilities, and cause renewed shipping disruptions with immediate price spikes in global energy and fertilizer markets.
Watch For
Iran is obligated to complete demining operations within 30 days of the MoU, a process that may influence which lanes are available. During the 60-day negotiation window, watch for Iran’s official map of authorized routes, any imposition of transit or service fees, and whether additional vessels defy IRGC warnings using the Omani corridor. Diplomatic moves by Oman, IMO coordination, and statements from the US, IRGC, and Foreign Minister Albusaidi will signal whether tensions escalate or de-escalate before a permanent agreement deadline.
Generated 61d ago · Based on full articleAuto-Compiled
This page aggregates and summarizes reporting from Al Jazeera. The Conflict Pulse does not author original reporting. Read the original source for full coverage.
CONFLICT OVERVIEW
Iran
Latest verified updates on Iran’s regional confrontation, U.S.–Israeli strikes, missile retaliation, proxy networks, sanctions, and Strait of Hormuz risks.
SOURCE PERSPECTIVES
How outlets across the bias spectrum are covering this conflict.
LATEST FROM IRAN

REPORTMiddle East Eye12d ago
Iran formalises Strait of Hormuz control as US struggles to sustain war it launched with Israel

REPORTAl Jazeera12d ago
US threatens ‘indefinite’ blockade against Iran: How long can it last?

REPORTMiddle East Eye12d ago
Morning update

REPORTMiddle East Eye12d ago
Vance says US will end up 'in a stronger position' than Iran
REPORTJerusalem Post — Iran News12d ago
US Treasury Secretary Bessent says US to apply measures 'never seen before' on Iran

REPORTAl Jazeera12d ago