Al Jazeera
centerREPORTDoes Trump have to submit the Iran memorandum of understanding to Congress?

Full BriefGenerated 66d ago
What Happened
A US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU) was announced this week to end the US-Israeli war with Iran, opening the Strait of Hormuz, lifting the US blockade on Iranian ports, halting fighting on all fronts including Lebanon, immediately lifting US sanctions on Iran's fossil fuel industry, and launching negotiations on the future of Iran's nuclear programme. Both countries agreed to maintain their nuclear 'status quo' and Iran committed to diluting its highly enriched uranium on site. The MoU has sparked debate over whether President Trump must submit it to Congress under the 2015 Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act (INARA), which mandates submission of any agreement with Iran related to its nuclear programme for a 30-day review and possible vote of disapproval. Senator Lindsey Graham invoked INARA, demanding congressional review, while legal experts Tess Bridgeman and Jack Goldsmith argued the law applies, with Goldsmith contending the sanctions relief likely violates INARA's freeze on sanctions during the review period. Trump has indicated openness to sending the deal to Congress but his administration has not committed, and experts doubt Congress or the courts will confront him over non-compliance.
Key Actors
- ·President Donald Trump(US President)Open to submitting the MoU to Congress but administration has not committed; claims broad presidential authority and may ignore INARA.
- ·Senator Lindsey Graham(US Senator (Republican))Invoked INARA, calling for the MoU to be submitted to Congress for review and a vote.
- ·Tess Bridgeman(Legal adviser for the Obama White House)Argues INARA applies to the MoU but advocates for its repeal to avoid impeding diplomacy.
- ·Jack Goldsmith(Harvard Law professor and American Enterprise Institute fellow)Believes the MoU should trigger INARA and that the sanctions waiver likely violates it, but expects no institutional challenge to Trump.
Why It Matters
The MoU ends a major military engagement and reshapes US-Iran relations, impacting regional stability from the Strait of Hormuz to Lebanon and altering the trajectory of Iran's nuclear programme. The INARA debate tests the separation of powers over nuclear agreements and sanctions, potentially setting a precedent for congressional oversight of executive diplomacy, while the immediate sanctions relief raises legal and political questions about the limits of presidential authority.
Watch For
Trump's decision on whether to formally submit the MoU to Congress within INARA's five-day deadline; any congressional resolutions of disapproval and the subsequent veto dynamics (requiring a two-thirds override); the start of US-Iran nuclear negotiations and the implementation of sanctions relief, particularly the immediate oil sanctions waiver that may face legal challenges under INARA.
Generated 66d ago · Based on full articleAuto-Compiled
This page aggregates and summarizes reporting from Al Jazeera. The Conflict Pulse does not author original reporting. Read the original source for full coverage.
CONFLICT OVERVIEW
Iran
Latest verified updates on Iran’s regional confrontation, U.S.–Israeli strikes, missile retaliation, proxy networks, sanctions, and Strait of Hormuz risks.
SOURCE PERSPECTIVES
How outlets across the bias spectrum are covering this conflict.
LATEST FROM IRAN

REPORTMiddle East Eye11d ago
Iran formalises Strait of Hormuz control as US struggles to sustain war it launched with Israel

REPORTAl Jazeera11d ago
US threatens ‘indefinite’ blockade against Iran: How long can it last?

REPORTMiddle East Eye11d ago
Morning update

REPORTMiddle East Eye11d ago
Vance says US will end up 'in a stronger position' than Iran
REPORTJerusalem Post — Iran News11d ago
US Treasury Secretary Bessent says US to apply measures 'never seen before' on Iran

REPORTAl Jazeera11d ago