LIVE
Conflict Pulse
· · VERIFIED SOURCES
All RegionsUkraine–RussiaIsrael–PalestineUnited StatesSudan / DarfurMyanmarEthiopia / TigrayLebanonVenezuelaIran
Al Jazeera
centerREPORT

Could the US take control of Iran’s southern islands?

Could the US take control of Iran’s southern islands?
NEWS SUMMARY
US forces have struck Iran’s Qeshm, Kish, and Abu Musa islands as part of an escalating campaign, reviving questions about a potential US seizure of Iranian territory. Analysts suggest the US has the tactical capability to seize islands but question Washington's willingness to incur the significant manpower and political costs of occupation.
Full BriefGenerated 39d ago
What Happened
US forces struck Iran's Qeshm, Kish, and Abu Musa islands, as well as the port city of Bandar Abbas, intensifying an air campaign against Iranian coastal infrastructure. The strikes followed revelations that the US Department of Defence had drawn up plans for ground raids on Kharg Island, through which about 90 percent of Iran's crude oil exports pass, though a US-Iran memorandum of understanding signed on 17 June temporarily reduced speculation. US President Donald Trump revived the question of territorial seizure in a Fox News interview, refusing to rule it out, while military analysts cautioned that any occupation would be militarily feasible but strategically costly, risking continuous attrition and political backlash.
Key Actors
  • ·
    US Department of Defense(US military planning body)Drafted plans for raids on Kharg Island and struck Qeshm, Kish, Abu Musa, and Bandar Abbas in recent days.
  • ·
    Donald Trump(US President)Refused to rule out seizing Iranian islands, reopening speculation.
  • ·
    Andreas Krieg(Security studies professor at King's College London)Assessed that seizing islands is tactically possible but would require thousands of troops and sustainment under Iranian fire, making long-term occupation strategically damaging.
  • ·
    Nader Hashemi(Middle East politics professor at Georgetown University)Expressed skepticism, arguing the political and human costs make an island seizure improbable.
Why It Matters
A US seizure of Iranian islands would dramatically escalate an already hot conflict, directly threatening the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint through which a fifth of global oil flows. It would risk transforming a limited air campaign into an open-ended occupation, exposing US troops to sustained Iranian reprisals and potentially drawing in regional actors. The move would also hand Iran a propaganda victory by casting the US as an occupying power, while imposing a heavy political toll on the Trump administration, particularly from its isolationist base.
Watch For
Monitor for US amphibious force movements in the Gulf, any Pentagon clarification or denial of seizure plans, and statements from IRGC commanders threatening retaliation. Watch for breakdown of the 17 June US-Iran memorandum of understanding and its impact on de-escalation. Any Iranian missile or drone activity near US naval assets in the Strait of Hormuz could signal preparation for a broader conflict. Also, track domestic US political reactions, especially from the Trump base, which may constrain military options.
Generated 39d ago · Based on full article
Auto-Compiled
This page aggregates and summarizes reporting from Al Jazeera. The Conflict Pulse does not author original reporting. Read the original source for full coverage.
READ ORIGINAL

Iran

Latest verified updates on Iran’s regional confrontation, U.S.–Israeli strikes, missile retaliation, proxy networks, sanctions, and Strait of Hormuz risks.

How outlets across the bias spectrum are covering this conflict.

VIEW ALL IRAN COVERAGE →