LIVE
Conflict Pulse
· · VERIFIED SOURCES
All RegionsIsrael–PalestineIranUkraine–RussiaUnited StatesLebanonSudan / DarfurMyanmarEthiopia / TigrayVenezuela
Middle East Eye
centerREPORT

Burnham approves US use of UK bases for some strikes on Iran, Bloomberg reports

Burnham approves US use of UK bases for some strikes on Iran, Bloomberg reports

Submitted by MEE staff on Wed, 07/22/2026 - 10:05 The move marks a continuation of predecessor Keir Starmer's policy, which rights groups warned could violate international law US forces launch strikes on Iran for the 11th consecutive night, a screengrab made available on 22 July 2026 from handout footage released by the US Central Command shows (AFP) Off British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has approved the US use of some UK bases for "defensive" air strikes on Iran, in a continuation of a polic

Full BriefGenerated 22d ago
What Happened
UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham approved the US military's continued use of British bases at Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford for 'defensive' airstrikes on Iran, according to Bloomberg sources who spoke on condition of anonymity. The decision, taken after a Friday meeting of senior ministers and officials under Burnham's predecessor Keir Starmer, extends a policy initiated by Starmer in early March. Burnham was briefed and agreed to the continuation. The approval comes as US Central Command (Centcom) conducts an 11th consecutive night of strikes on Iranian cities, including Bushehr, Tabriz, and Chabahar, claiming to target operations centres, logistics infrastructure, maritime capabilities, aircraft hangars, and drone storage. In response, Iran has launched retaliatory strikes on US-allied neighbours, including Jordan, Bahrain, Syria, and Kuwait.
Key Actors
  • ·
    UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham(Head of UK government)Approved the continued US use of UK bases for strikes on Iran, maintaining a policy from his predecessor.
  • ·
    US Central Command (Centcom)(US military command conducting operations in the Middle East)Carrying out aerial bombardment of Iran from UK bases and claiming strikes on military infrastructure.
  • ·
    Iran(Sovereign state targeted by US strikes)Launching retaliatory strikes on US-allied nations in response to the bombardment.
  • ·
    Human Rights Watch(International human rights organisation)Warned that the UK's legal justification ignores international humanitarian law, citing a US strike on a school in Minab that killed over 150 people, mostly children.
Why It Matters
The decision deepens UK military entanglement in the US–Iran conflict and raises significant legal and diplomatic risks. It ties the UK directly to strikes that have caused civilian casualties, including the Minab school attack for which a Pentagon investigation found US responsibility. The policy may violate international humanitarian law, according to Human Rights Watch, and could provoke further Iranian retaliation against Western interests. Domestically, it is likely to face political and legal backlash, while straining UK relations with Iran and regional actors.
Watch For
Parliamentary debates or legal challenges in the UK over the legality of base usage; further details from the Pentagon on the Minab school strike investigation; escalation in Iranian retaliatory strikes on US-allied states; reactions from the E3, EU, UN, and GCC; and any broadening of the US bombing campaign, particularly if targeting expands to the Strait of Hormuz.
Generated 22d ago · Based on full article
Auto-Compiled
This page aggregates and summarizes reporting from Middle East Eye. The Conflict Pulse does not author original reporting. Read the original source for full coverage.
READ ORIGINAL

Iran

Latest verified updates on Iran’s regional confrontation, U.S.–Israeli strikes, missile retaliation, proxy networks, sanctions, and Strait of Hormuz risks.

How outlets across the bias spectrum are covering this conflict.

VIEW ALL IRAN COVERAGE →