Al Jazeera
centerDEVELOPINGWhat drove Venezuela’s decision to leave the ICC?

The ICC says its investigation into alleged crimes against humanity will continue despite the withdrawal.
Full BriefGenerated 4m ago
What Happened
Venezuela's Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia announced on Friday that the country had formally notified the United Nations of its withdrawal from the Rome Statute, the treaty establishing the International Criminal Court (ICC). The instructions, he said, came from Interim President Delcy Rodriguez, who called the decision 'firm and irrevocable.' Plasencia accused the ICC of 'demonstrated geographical bias' for disproportionately targeting countries in Africa and Latin America. The United States quickly welcomed the move, with the State Department praising Rodriguez for joining 'American-led efforts to dismantle the corrupt and worthless ICC' and urging other member states to follow. The ICC stated that it had not yet received formal notification through the UN treaty office, but under the Rome Statute, withdrawal takes effect one year after notification and does not affect ongoing investigations or matters already before the court. The ICC's investigation into alleged crimes against humanity committed by Venezuelan security forces and pro-government groups during a crackdown on protests since 2017 will therefore continue.
Key Actors
- ·Venezuela government(Interim President Delcy Rodriguez and Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia)Formally notified the UN of withdrawal from the Rome Statute, accusing the ICC of bias and aligning with US-led efforts to dismantle the court.
- ·International Criminal Court (ICC)(Permanent international tribunal for prosecuting genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes)Investigating alleged crimes against humanity in Venezuela since 2021; withdrawal does not halt the probe, which will continue.
- ·United States(US Department of State, under President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio)Welcomed Venezuela's withdrawal and urged other ICC member states to leave; has intensified attacks on the court, calling it 'corrupt and worthless' and vowing to dismantle it.
Why It Matters
The withdrawal signals a shift in Venezuela's foreign policy under Delcy Rodriguez, moving closer to Washington and aligning with US efforts to undermine the ICC. While the move does not halt the investigation into alleged crimes against humanity, it signals Caracas's commitment not to cooperate, potentially shielding officials still in power. This comes as the Trump administration escalates its campaign against the court, and it adds to growing hopelessness among Venezuelans seeking accountability for state violence. The decision also highlights the ICC's practical dependence on state cooperation and may embolden other states to withdraw, further weakening the institution.
Watch For
Monitor whether the ICC receives the formal notification and the one-year countdown begins. Watch for any progress or obstacles in the continuing investigation, including whether Venezuelan authorities cooperate or retaliate against witnesses. Track whether other ICC member states follow Venezuela's lead, especially amid US pressure. Also, observe the US's next steps in its campaign against the ICC, including potential sanctions or diplomatic actions.
Generated 4m ago · Based on full articleAuto-Compiled
This page aggregates and summarizes reporting from Al Jazeera. The Conflict Pulse does not author original reporting. Read the original source for full coverage.
CONFLICT OVERVIEW
Venezuela
Latest verified updates on Venezuela’s political crisis, U.S. intervention, oil-sector recovery, migration, democratic transition demands, and regional fallout.
Active since February 2014
SOURCE PERSPECTIVES
How outlets across the bias spectrum are covering this conflict.
Limited perspective coverage. Only center-leaning sources currently tracked for this region.
LATEST FROM VENEZUELA



