LIVE
Conflict Pulse
· · VERIFIED SOURCES
All RegionsUkraine–RussiaIsrael–PalestineUnited StatesSudan / DarfurMyanmarEthiopia / TigrayLebanonVenezuelaIran
Middle East Eye
centerREPORT

Former EU top diplomat denounces ICC bureau’s disregard for judicial findings on Karim Khan

Former EU top diplomat denounces ICC bureau’s disregard for judicial findings on Karim Khan
NEWS SUMMARY
Former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell denounced the International Criminal Court's Assembly of States Parties (ASP) bureau for planning a "political vote" on Prosecutor Karim Khan's future on July 24, despite a judicial panel finding insufficient evidence of misconduct. Borrell argued this move, which he claims ignores judicial findings and follows US sanctions and threats against Khan, is part of an effort to weaken the court by its own member states.
Full BriefGenerated 38d ago
What Happened
Former EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell denounced the executive bureau of the International Criminal Court’s Assembly of States Parties (ASP) for seeking to remove ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan via a ‘political vote’ on 24 July at the UN, contrary to a judicial panel’s finding that evidence of misconduct was insufficient. The bureau, composed of diplomats from 21 member states, determined by a two-thirds majority last month that Khan committed ‘serious misconduct’ — a conclusion Borrell argued disregarded the panel’s review. He linked the case to a broader US-Israeli offensive against the ICC following Khan’s May 2024 applications for arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas officials. The bureau also altered the voting procedure from a required two-stage process to a single vote requiring an absolute majority (63 of 125 members) to oust Khan, and reframed the alleged misconduct from non-consensual conduct to a consensual relationship with a power imbalance, a claim both Khan and the complainant deny. Borrell cited US sanctions on 11 ICC officials and a Wall Street Journal article by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio pledging to dismantle the court ‘brick by brick’, as well as reported Trump overtures to China and Russia to join the campaign.
Key Actors
  • ·
    Josep Borrell(Former EU foreign policy chief)Denounced the ASP bureau’s move to remove Khan, arguing it is part of a US-Israeli offensive to undermine the ICC’s independence and protect allies from war crimes allegations.
  • ·
    Karim Khan(ICC Prosecutor)Is facing removal after the ASP bureau ignored a judicial panel that cleared him of wrongdoing; denies any misconduct and has sought arrest warrants against Israeli and Hamas leaders.
  • ·
    ASP Executive Bureau(Diplomatic body of 21 ICC member states)Voted to recommend Khan’s removal, disregarding a judicial finding of insufficient evidence, and merged the voting process into a single absolute-majority ballot.
Why It Matters
The vote on Khan’s future represents a flashpoint in the struggle over international criminal accountability in the Israel–Palestine conflict. If Khan is removed, the ICC’s ability to pursue cases against senior Israeli and Hamas leaders could be compromised, emboldening governments that oppose the court’s jurisdiction and potentially weakening the broader international justice system amid heightened geopolitical pressure from the US and its allies.
Watch For
The ASP vote at UN headquarters in New York on 24 July. Monitor whether the altered single-vote procedure is challenged and how member states align. Also watch for any new US sanctions or diplomatic moves ahead of the vote, and the potential fallout for ongoing ICC arrest warrant applications.
Generated 38d ago · Based on full article
Auto-Compiled
This page aggregates and summarizes reporting from Middle East Eye. The Conflict Pulse does not author original reporting. Read the original source for full coverage.
READ ORIGINAL

Israel–Palestine

Latest verified updates on Gaza, the West Bank, Israeli military operations, Palestinian politics, humanitarian conditions, and international diplomacy.

Active since May 1948

How outlets across the bias spectrum are covering this conflict.

VIEW ALL ISRAEL–PALESTINE COVERAGE →