LIVE
Conflict Pulse
· · VERIFIED SOURCES
All RegionsIranUkraine–RussiaIsrael–PalestineVenezuelaUnited StatesSudan / DarfurMyanmarEthiopia / TigrayLebanon
The Intercept
leftDEVELOPING

“Board of Peace” Billionaire Backs AIPAC Fund Targeting Pro-Palestine Candidates

“Board of Peace” Billionaire Backs AIPAC Fund Targeting Pro-Palestine Candidates
NEWS SUMMARY
Billionaire Marc Rowan has donated $1.5 million to the United Democracy Project, a super PAC affiliated with AIPAC, to support pro-Israel political candidates. Rowan, who also serves on Trump's "Board of Peace" for Gaza, has directed funds towards efforts targeting critics of U.S. support for Israel, including candidates like Abdul El-Sayed and Cori Bush.
Based on full article · updated 9h ago
Full BriefGenerated 7h ago
What Happened
Marc Rowan, CEO of Apollo Global Management and member of a body referred to as the Board of Peace, has donated $1.5 million in 2024 to the United Democracy Project (UDP), a super PAC affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Federal Election Commission filings indicate Rowan contributed $1 million in March and $500,000 on July 23. The UDP has utilized these funds to support pro-Israel candidates and oppose those critical of U.S. military aid to Israel, including unsuccessful campaigns by former Rep. Cori Bush and Rep. Thomas Massie. Critics, including Democracy for the Arab World Now advocacy director Raed Jarrar, have raised concerns regarding the influence of private donors on the future governance of Gaza through the Board of Peace.
Key Actors
  • ·
    Marc Rowan(CEO of Apollo Global Management and Board of Peace member)He has donated $1.5 million to the AIPAC-affiliated United Democracy Project to support pro-Israel political candidates.
  • ·
    AIPAC(Pro-Israel lobbying organization)The group utilizes its super PAC, the United Democracy Project, to fund campaigns against candidates who oppose continued U.S. military aid to Israel.
  • ·
    Hamas(Governing authority in Gaza and militant group)The group maintains that it will only surrender weapons in exchange for a full Israeli military withdrawal and the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Why It Matters
The intersection of private campaign financing and the development of post-war governance plans for Gaza highlights the influence of external actors on U.S. foreign policy. As AIPAC increases its spending to counter candidates advocating for an arms embargo on Israel, the debate over the conditions of U.S. military support for the ongoing conflict in Gaza has become a central issue in domestic electoral politics.
Watch For
Monitor further FEC filings for additional contributions from major donors to PACs involved in the Israel-Palestine policy debate. Additionally, observe the legislative activities of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, particularly regarding military technology sharing agreements between the U.S. and Israel, and any further developments regarding the Board of Peace's role in Gaza's future.
Generated 7h ago · Based on full article
Auto-Compiled
This page aggregates and summarizes reporting from The Intercept. The Conflict Pulse does not author original reporting. Read the original source for full coverage.
READ ORIGINAL

Israel–Palestine

Latest verified updates on Gaza, the West Bank, Israeli military operations, Palestinian politics, humanitarian conditions, and international diplomacy.

Active since May 1948

How outlets across the bias spectrum are covering this conflict.

VIEW ALL ISRAEL–PALESTINE COVERAGE →