Jerusalem Post — Iran News
rightREPORTIran's Araghchi admits six-member committee led nuclear talks, says he never met Khamenei
Experts have frequently called into question the role of Khamenei, who has not been seen since being injured in the same attack that killed his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Full BriefGenerated 23d ago
What Happened
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi disclosed that a six-member subcommittee of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) had made on-the-spot decisions during negotiations for the now-defunct Memorandum of Understanding with the United States, admitting that he has never met Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei. The subcommittee—which includes President Masoud Pezeshkian, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, SNSC Secretary Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, Araghchi, and two unnamed individuals—was formed after the 12 Day War and originally chaired by IRGC figure Shahid Shamkhani as a nuclear committee before evolving into a negotiating body under Ali Larijani. Araghchi stated that the committee’s approvals followed SNSC procedure and that communication with the top leadership was difficult, highlighting Khamenei’s limited role in recent months. He also insisted that Iran is winning the ongoing war but defended negotiations to end it, citing the risk of infrastructure collapse. Analysts and a Wall Street Journal report indicated that IRGC Commander Ahmad Vahidi overruled Araghchi and Pezeshkian in Pakistan talks, reflecting a power struggle exposed by the vacuum left after the death of former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
Key Actors
- ·Abbas Araghchi(Iranian Foreign Minister)Admitted the SNSC subcommittee's role in negotiations and his lack of direct contact with Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, while defending the pursuit of negotiations from a position of military strength.
- ·Mojtaba Khamenei(Supreme Leader of Iran)Has not been seen publicly since an attack that killed his father; Araghchi stated he has never met him, and his limited role in decision-making has exposed a power struggle among other officials.
- ·Ahmad Vahidi(Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC))Reportedly pushed for harder lines in negotiations and overruled Araghchi and President Pezeshkian, indicating that the IRGC retains decisive influence over Iran's strategic decisions.
- ·Six-member SNSC subcommittee(Decision-making body for negotiations with the US)Composed of President Pezeshkian, Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf, SNSC Secretary Zolghadr, Araghchi, and two unnamed figures; made binding decisions in lieu of the supreme leader due to communication difficulties.
Why It Matters
Araghchi’s admission strips away the façade of unified leadership in Tehran, exposing the fragmented decision-making and the IRGC’s ascendancy after the death of Ali Khamenei. The revelation underscores the lack of direct supreme leader involvement in critical negotiations, raising questions about the legitimacy and durability of any agreements. It also highlights the internal tug-of-war between elements favoring diplomatic engagement and hardliners resistant to compromise, which directly impacts Iran’s nuclear posture, regional proxy activities, and the prospects for de-escalation with the US and Israel.
Watch For
Monitoring should focus on any public appearance or statement by Mojtaba Khamenei, as it would signal an attempt to reassert supreme leader authority. Further leaks or reports on the composition and decisions of the SNSC subcommittee could reveal the true balance of power. Additionally, track any resumption or breakdown of US-Iran talks, especially in Oman or Pakistan, and watch for IRGC statements or military moves that might override diplomatic tracks, as hinted by Vahidi’s reported intervention.
Generated 23d ago · Based on full articleAuto-Compiled
This page aggregates and summarizes reporting from Jerusalem Post — Iran News. The Conflict Pulse does not author original reporting. Read the original source for full coverage.
CONFLICT OVERVIEW
Iran
Latest verified updates on Iran’s regional confrontation, U.S.–Israeli strikes, missile retaliation, proxy networks, sanctions, and Strait of Hormuz risks.
SOURCE PERSPECTIVES
How outlets across the bias spectrum are covering this conflict.
left
Ukrainian cathedrals, Gaza’s archives, Iranian squares – modern war is systematically erasing human history | Simon Jenkins
The Guardian Middle EastSouth Korean airport becomes busiest in world for global traffic amid Iran war
The Guardian AsiaLATEST FROM IRAN

DEVELOPINGAl Jazeera7h ago
Is Russia’s economy cracking despite the Iran war windfall?

DEVELOPINGMiddle East Eye9h ago
Iranian military rejects US claims that vessels are transiting the Strait of Hormuz

DEVELOPINGMiddle East Eye11h ago
Iranian press review: Tehran says it will no longer wait to be attacked

REPORTAl Jazeera12h ago
US-Iran talks in deadlock – what’s the latest?

REPORTMiddle East Eye13h ago
Iran attacks US failures as scepticism grows over Israeli role in Trump 'assassination plot'

REPORTAl Jazeera18h ago